Characterization of the supervision of clinical reasoning by nurse anesthetists with student nurse anesthetists: a qualitative study

Introduction: Errors in reasoning are the main causes of poor decision-making in clinical practice. To remedy this, many studies highlight the importance of supervising clinical reasoning during medical internships. Although decision-making is an ongoing process at all key moments of the perioperative period, there are no studies on the supervision of clinical reasoning during student nurse anesthetist internships. The objective of this study was to identify the characteristics of the supervision of clinical reasoning by anesthesia professionals with student nurse anesthetists. Methodology: A multicenter qualitative study was carried out using observations and individual interviews with five nurse anesthetists and five students. Results: Three themes are identified: the characteristics of the learner’s and supervisor’s posture ; the teaching methods used ; and the specificities of clinical reasoning. Analysis: The nurse anesthetists question clinical reasoning only when they detect difficulties in the student. However, no traceability is carried out. Students spontaneously verbalize their clinical reasoning when unexpected events occur. Discussion: The results will be used as a basis for a new tool for tracing learning during internships.